Compare NGINX Web Application Firewall vs. R&S Web Application Firewall

NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Fortinet FortiWeb and PerimeterX Bot Defender.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found.The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.It is a very good tool for load balancing.

Read more »

The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis.

Read more »

Cons
Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time.The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.

Read more »

The area that should be improved is licensing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,209
Comparisons
960
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
467
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
262
Comparisons
205
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
479
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
NGINX WAFRohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn
F5
Video Not Available
Rohde & Schwarz
Overview

Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Offer
Learn more about NGINX Web Application Firewall
Learn more about R&S Web Application Firewall
Sample Customers
m.a.x IT
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.