Compare NGINX Web Application Firewall vs. StackPath WAF

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.""Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."

More NGINX Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.
Top Answer: Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year. We pay on an annual basis. We just have our operating costs on top of that.
Top Answer: The solution does well when there's low throughput but when we go for any high throughput, it's always a challenge. I'm expecting the next version to have a better high throughput. I also find that… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,697
Comparisons
2,218
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
584
Rating
8.0
Views
841
Comparisons
767
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
NGINX WAF
StackPath Web Application Firewall
Learn More
StackPath
Video Not Available
Overview

Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.

StackPath WAF integrates multiple technologies, including Advanced Browser Validation and IP Reputation and Custom Rules engines, into an intelligent firewall that can be customized to meet your specific protection profile.

Offer
Learn more about NGINX Web Application Firewall
Learn more about StackPath WAF
Sample Customers
m.a.x IT
Robotics Cats, Jewlr
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company25%
Media Company9%
Manufacturing Company5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0, while StackPath WAF is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and F5 Silverline DDoS Protection, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare and AWS WAF.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.