Anonymous UserProduct Manager - Technical at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
"Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
Earn 20 points
Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.
StackPath WAF integrates multiple technologies, including Advanced Browser Validation and IP Reputation and Custom Rules engines, into an intelligent firewall that can be customized to meet your specific protection profile.
NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0, while StackPath WAF is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and F5 Silverline DDoS Protection, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.