We performed a comparison between Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The solution's technical support is good."
"The alerts are the most valuable feature because we have different alerts. Different data is fed to Actimize. It alerts us if a transaction happened from a certain place."
"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"It's a very good case management system."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"Could include additional customization"
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."
"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."
"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."
"This solution is unnecessarily complex."
"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and BioCatch, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
