We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Oracle BPEL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The product has everything we need."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 8th in Process Automation with 21 reviews while Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPEL report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
