Most Helpful Review
It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention.
Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity.
This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly.
It provides data accuracy with fewer failures.
It saves time as tasks are automated.
Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email.
I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance.
This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer.
It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get.
The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features.
Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support.
Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies.
Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform.
Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting.
Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved.
User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful.
Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise.
While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful.
Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best.
Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet.
The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother.
There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues.
It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge.
Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services.
Business specific functionality is needed.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Our maintenance costs are reduced.
Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform.
Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there.
They have both on-premise and cloud licensing. If you are a small to medium company, go for the cloud option because that eliminates a lot of the setting up of your DevTest and performance environments, multiple environments, because you can buy that from Pega with the cloud option. So your setup time really goes down. If you're a large company, then you're better off putting it within your company. You have other skill resources within your company to create environments.
They need to come up with licensing options. Right now they do have a cloud-based option, but the cloud prices I've seen are much more expensive compared to competing products.
Licensing is expensive. You need to wisely select between per user and per case.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
See more Nintex Workflow competitors »
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
See more Pega BPM competitors »
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
|Also Known As||Nintex Workflow Platform||Pegasystems, SmartBPM|
Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Learn more about Pega BPM
Information Not Available
|The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement|
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS