NMQA QABook vs Usersnap comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NMQA Logo
19 views|8 comparisons
Usersnap Logo
10 views|4 comparisons
Ranking
6th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
19
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
10
Comparisons
4
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
QABook
Learn More
NMQA
Video Not Available
Usersnap
Video Not Available
Overview
Test management product that is offered on premises or in the cloud via desktop, Microsoft SharePoint, or the web.

Usersnap is a central place to organize & track bugs and collect user feedback. Key features include: Real-time collaboration, Contextual information, ad-hoc feedback widget and seamless integration.

Sample Customers
Capgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI
Google, Erstes, Microsoft, Runtastic, Onshape, Talkdesk, Fast Company, Hawaiian Airlines

NMQA QABook is ranked 6th in Defect Tracking while Usersnap is ranked 14th in Customer Feedback Management. NMQA QABook is rated 0.0, while Usersnap is rated 0.0. On the other hand, NMQA QABook is most compared with , whereas Usersnap is most compared with .

We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.