"The most valuable feature of this solution is its integration with API gateways, WAP and with part of their SDLC."
"It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues."
"I think it would be good if they can integrate more with API gateways as this is currently limited."
"The integration part could be a bit extended."
Noname Security is ranked 1st in API Security with 1 review while Salt Security is ranked 2nd in API Security with 1 review. Noname Security is rated 8.0, while Salt Security is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Noname Security writes "Security platform that offers value through its integration with API gateways". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salt Security writes "Provides visibility and control over all APIs". Noname Security is most compared with Traceable AI, NGINX App Protect, Akamai API Security, Cequence Security and Wallarm NG WAF, whereas Salt Security is most compared with Wallarm NG WAF, Traceable AI, Skybox Security Suite, Orca Security and 42Crunch API Security Platform.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.