Compare NowSecure vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
71,039 views|38,259 comparisons
NowSecure Logo
394 views|232 comparisons
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
7,460 views|3,686 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: April 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: My experience with Veracode across the board every time, in all products, the technology, the product, the service, and… more »
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn More
NowSecure
Video Not Available
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

NowSecure experts have conducted advanced pen testing for some of the world's most demanding organizations - including banks, insurance companies, government agencies, healthcare organizations, retail conglomerates, high-tech businesses, and more. Mobile apps are prone to sensitive data leakages and attacks, yet a manual test for just one app can take several weeks. To enable faster, more frequent testing, we built a test engine that successfully automates repeatable and time-consuming mobile appsec testing, remediation and reporting tasks. The result - the foundation of the NowSecure platform, which significantly reduces testing time and costs without compromising full depth of security coverage.

Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about NowSecure
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Vaporstream, FIS, MEA Financial, Silent Circle, Capital One, Citi, EY, EMC, Emerson, Kaiser Permanente, The Home Depot, Humana, Shell, Kellogg's, TD Bank, VMware
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: April 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NowSecure is ranked 25th in Application Security Testing (AST) while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 16th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. NowSecure is rated 0.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Creates tests automatically based on recorded traffic". NowSecure is most compared with ImmuniWeb and GitLab, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, SoapUI Pro, Coverity and SmartBear TestComplete.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.