Compare NSFOCUS TAS vs. Thor Vigilance Enterprise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
50th
out of 50 in Anti-Malware Tools
Views
7
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
37th
out of 50 in Anti-Malware Tools
Views
49
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, McAfee and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: May 2021.
502,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
NSFOCUS Threat Analysis System
Learn More
Overview

NSFOCUS TA provides virtual sandboxing capabilities capable of detecting, analyzing, and mitigating known, zero-day, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). The TA appliance monitors CPU, network activity, memory utilization, and system driver behavior in a virtual environment

This lightweight, hassle-free solution combines the techniques known by both traditional and next-gen antivirus engines to provide unparalleled protection against online threats.
It will stop ransomware, data leakage, viruses, APTs, exploits and other threats to your digital life.

Offer
Learn more about NSFOCUS TAS
Learn more about Thor Vigilance Enterprise
Sample Customers
G20 Summit 2016
Brother, Symbion, CPH West
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, McAfee and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: May 2021.
502,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NSFOCUS TAS is ranked 50th in Anti-Malware Tools while Thor Vigilance Enterprise is ranked 37th in Anti-Malware Tools. NSFOCUS TAS is rated 0.0, while Thor Vigilance Enterprise is rated 0.0. On the other hand, NSFOCUS TAS is most compared with , whereas Thor Vigilance Enterprise is most compared with .

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.