We performed a comparison between NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Since we are using this tool for protection purposes we really appreciate the hybrid security abilities; the main idea here is that we powerful protection our application needs."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."
"The best part is that we are able to manage it easily. It is easy to manage and easy to integrate with third-party applications."
"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
"The most valuable aspect is the ability to customize the types of load-balancing scenarios needed for customized applications. Some of the load balancers on the market today are strictly out-of-hand load balancers for SSL or HTTP. Radware Alteon is most useful for customizing in-house applications based on ports and protocols."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"I like the web GUI. It's very intuitive and easy to use."
"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."
"There is a need for expanded licensing terms and options. There's also a need for improved and more agile customization features. The user needs to be able to manage each policy as required; the functionality needs to empower the user. There should be a complete suite of desktop provider policies available to users. Overall, it needs to be more user-friendly."
"I would like this solution to have an integration tool that will convert configuration from other software, into readable values for this product during implementation."
"The solution could be more robust."
"I would like to see future enhancements in security, specifically in threat protection."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
"Recently our team was talking about the things you can customize in Alteon and the level of programming that doing so demands. I would like to see more information on how to customize the programming and troubleshoot."
"The user interface can be improved."
"We recently had a problem with the tables Obsolete ARP which was observed by the support team. It would be good to diagnose and solve this problem with a patch since it is not documented that it will be solved in later updates."
Earn 20 points
NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is ranked 41st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Radware Alteon is ranked 10th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 33 reviews. NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is rated 7.0, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall writes "Offers Application Protection Against Web Attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is most compared with , whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.