• Home
  • NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] vs. SourceClear [EOL]

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] vs SourceClear [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] and SourceClear [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.
It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC.
Use SourceClear [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Security Testing (AST)
Unranked
In Application Security Testing (AST)
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
NTOSpider
Learn More
Rapid7
Veracode
Overview
While today's malicious attackers pursue a variety of goals, they share a preferred channel of attack - the millions of custom web, mobile, and cloud applications companies deploy to serve their customers. NTOSpider dynamically scans these applications for vulnerabilities across all modern technologies, provides tools that speed remediation and monitors applications for changes.

SourceClear provides a way to easily check the open-source libraries being used in your code repositories for vulnerabilities. By utilizing the native build and package managers which manage your open-source libraries, SourceClear is capable of accurately identifying vulnerabilities in your open-source code and additionally providing fix information for vulnerabilities you might have.

Sample Customers
University of Salzburg, Chr. Hansen, American Chemical Society, North American Retail Chain, Wiltshire Council, Redner's Markets, Acosta Sales & Marketing
Zendesk, Medallia, Marchex, GAP, Datastax
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST) while SourceClear [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST). NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] is rated 9.0, while SourceClear [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] writes "There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product". On the other hand, NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SourceClear [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.