Compare NTT Application Security eLearning vs. Veracode Security Labs

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NTT Application Security eLearning vs. Veracode Security Labs and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It's expensive. Know that going in. Your organization, your programmers, and your product will be better for it though.""The pricing for qualified startups should only charge for Veracode Developer Training."

More Veracode Security Labs Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Training Software solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It provides a complete review of vulnerabilities & possible fixes for OWASP Top 10 in one place.
Top Answer: The pricing for qualified startups should only charge for Veracode Developer Training. The licensing cost should be fair, and the use cost when the company or the clients release their product to the… more »
Top Answer: The following areas should be improved: * Veracode Security Labs should cover more than only the OWASP Top 10. * A more advanced Veracode Security Labs should be added. * More Java-based labs should… more »
Ranking
Views
75
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
390
Comparisons
147
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
437
Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WhiteHat Security CBT, WhiteHat Security Computer-Based Training
Veracode Developer Training
Learn More
Overview

WhiteHat Security Computer-Based Training (CBT) offers a cost-effective way to create and scale a training initiative across your business. The CBT content develops, reinforces, and assesses secure coding practices with self-paced, interactive sessions that are engaging and easy to deploy for small, large, and distributed teams.

Veracode Security Labs shifts application security knowledge left, training developers to tackle modern threats in the evolving cybersecurity landscape by exploiting and patching real code, and applying DevSecOps principles to deliver secure code on time. Through hands-on labs that use modern web apps written in your chosen languages, developers learn the skills and strategies that are directly applicable to an organization's code. With detailed progress reporting, email assignments, and a leaderboard, developers are encouraged to continuously level up their secure coding skills. When development is empowered to fix security defects and reduce risk, security teams are better supported to scale AppSec programs, meet compliance requirements, and achieve business outcomes.

Offer
Learn more about NTT Application Security eLearning
Learn more about Veracode Security Labs
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
McKESSON, Alfresco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Performing Arts23%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company10%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise25%

NTT Application Security eLearning is ranked 4th in Application Security Training Software while Veracode Security Labs is ranked 1st in Application Security Training Software with 7 reviews. NTT Application Security eLearning is rated 0.0, while Veracode Security Labs is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode Security Labs writes "Produces reliable software scans but overall database scanning needs to be improved". NTT Application Security eLearning is most compared with , whereas Veracode Security Labs is most compared with Codebashing.

See our list of best Application Security Training Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Training Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.