We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."The most valuable aspect of this solution is that you don't need to pay for it, it's free, as opposed to paying for a VMware license."
"With AHV, you can run micro-segmentation, which is, on the network security level, to have network virtualization across clouds."
"It has a vs switch for the people who know Linux, in case it's easier for them to use AHV than it is to use VMware."
"Nutanix AHV Virtualization is a private cloud platform offering integration with various public cloud providers. This integration allows for a multi-cloud approach. In my opinion, Nutanix AHV Virtualization's strength is its storage. It innovates and excels in the hyper-converged storage segment, making it the number one choice in this area."
"It is the simple non-consideration we get with this product that's great. It just works."
"This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"The support is excellent."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"I haven't come across any limitations. Nutanix doesn't support externally attached storage through Fibre Channel. However, Nutanix doesn't support Fibre Channel connectivity. This, in my opinion, is a weakness of Nutanix. For instance, it does not support Cyber Talent. To clarify, you cannot connect external Fibre Channel storage or NAS storage resources with Nutanix. However, VMware vSAN supports such solutions."
"The initial installation is complex. It took approximately four days."
"The software based controller has high consumption. This could be improved."
"The management console needs to improve to make it easier for administrators. For example, to be able to reorganize our VMs, folders, and subfolders, similarly as it is provided in VMware. We can sort, manage, and organize VMs, folders, or subfolders in VMware."
"In terms of improvement, I think that they could have more partnerships with providers."
"It would be better if the solution's replication to another site could be efficiently optimized."
"There are some issues with the interface and integration."
"There are times when consultants, construction, or building firms need to use Beam but it can be difficult."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 44 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, KVM and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.