We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nutanix AHV Logo
4,620 views|3,539 comparisons
RHEV Logo
Read 12 RHEV reviews.
8,373 views|7,030 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix AHV vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For our markets here in Morocco, we are mainly working with server virtualization, and the most valuable feature is the software-defined storage and hyper-converged infrastructure.""This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues.""The most valuable aspect of this solution is that you don't need to pay for it, it's free, as opposed to paying for a VMware license.""It is the simple non-consideration we get with this product that's great. It just works.""The most valuable feature is the integration between storage and compute services.""The entirety of the infrastructure resides in the same product, which makes it easy to troubleshoot and investigate problems.""Nutanix AHV is very scalable. It can go to unlimited nodes.""It has a vs switch for the people who know Linux, in case it's easier for them to use AHV than it is to use VMware."

More Nutanix AHV Pros »

"It is easy to deal with when comes to application migration and its compatibility with the multiple component applications.""The solution makes migration easy.""There aren't any bugs on the solution.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the support portal.""It is very stable.""What they provide is way beyond the essential requirements of customers.""This solution is very stable. Much more so than similar products.""The solution is overall very good with all the facilities. It is user friendly, easy to configure, has documentation, and support is available."

More RHEV Pros »

Cons
"In terms of improvement, I think that they could have more partnerships with providers.""The solution could improve the call logging system to HPE, it is a bit tedious.""When we need to share, publish, or encrypt something, we still need to perform it using the command line.""If you have the need for special hardware like FibreChannel-Cards or such and there is no networked-way around it (such as you could work with USB Dongles via an HW-Dongle-Server of network), you have to use a separate hypervisor.""There is no web interface with AHV.""It worked well in the beginning but after using it for some time, we found some limitations in terms of compatibility with other software.""In the next release of this solution, I would like to see support for containerization.""Lacks integration with the cloud or other solutions."

More Nutanix AHV Cons »

"Red Hat by itself is not scalable. But you can have third party add-ons like Ceph to make it massively scalable.""The availability of technical expertise with the solution may be limited in some areas.""We hope that Red Hat can produce a paradigm edition. We are looking for paradigm computing and paradigm storage. Its scalability can be improved. It is not easy to scale, and we hope that Red Hat can provide a more scalable system. They should also provide local service and support. Our customers are looking for a good software vendor to provide professional services.""The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them.""When we do a direct comparison, then obviously VMware does better in terms of having Fault Tolerance and doing active disaster recovery and these kind of things. This is something that can be improved within Red Hat.""This solution could be more secure.""The documentation is not as good as it should be.""Customers are not aware of this solution, they can improve by providing more awareness and solution availability."

More RHEV Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"AHV is free, it's an open-source solution.""The price of the solution is fair and if you want support there are additional fees.""The price of the solution can always be lower. However, the price of the solution is reasonable.""Some of the features required additional licenses.""We don't have to pay extra for Acropolis because it is built into Nutanix."

More Nutanix AHV Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The solution does not require licencing but a subscription is necessary, which is very affordable.""We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions.""We are using the free version of Red Hat.""I believe we pay on a yearly basis.""We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance."

More RHEV Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: To understand which is better - Nutanix AHV or VMware vSphere - you need to do a product comparison. Both products support hypervisors. However, Nutanix supports some of the most popular ones and more… more »
Top Answer: For our markets here in Morocco, we are mainly working with server virtualization, and the most valuable feature is the software-defined storage and hyper-converged infrastructure.
Top Answer: The price of the solution can always be lower. However, the price of the solution is reasonable.
Top Answer: We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions.
Top Answer: We hope that Red Hat can produce a paradigm edition. We are looking for paradigm computing and paradigm storage. Its scalability can be improved. It is not easy to scale, and we hope that Red Hat can… more »
Ranking
Views
4,620
Comparisons
3,539
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
536
Rating
9.0
Views
8,373
Comparisons
7,030
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
443
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
Learn More
Overview

Nutanix makes infrastructure invisible, elevating IT to focus on the applications and services that power their business. The Nutanix enterprise cloud platform leverages web-scale engineering and consumer-grade design to natively converge compute, virtualization and storage into a resilient, software-defined solution with rich machine intelligence. The result is predictable performance, cloud-like infrastructure consumption, robust security, and seamless application mobility for a broad range of enterprise applications.

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.

Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.


Offer
Learn more about Nutanix AHV
Learn more about RHEV
Sample Customers
JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company23%
Government7%
Retailer5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider30%
Integrator20%
Manufacturing Company20%
Government10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider27%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise17%
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise30%
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix AHV vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Nutanix AHV is ranked 9th in Server Virtualization Software with 12 reviews while RHEV is ranked 8th in Server Virtualization Software with 12 reviews. Nutanix AHV is rated 9.0, while RHEV is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV writes "Easy to set up with good stability and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RHEV writes "The versatility and compatability of this virtualization solution are marred by the lack of availability of local support". Nutanix AHV is most compared with Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, KVM, Hyper-V and Oracle VM, whereas RHEV is most compared with KVM, VMware vSphere, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM and Oracle VM VirtualBox. See our Nutanix AHV vs. RHEV report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.