Compare Nutanix Prism vs. Zabbix

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
8,422 views|4,173 comparisons
Nutanix Prism Logo
1,918 views|1,610 comparisons
Zabbix Logo
46,065 views|33,411 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Prism vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I only deal with the infrastructure side, so I really couldn't speak to more than load balancing as the most valuable feature for me. It provides specific actions that prevent resource starvation. It always keeps things in perfect balance.""I have the ability to automate things similar to the Orchestrator stuff. I do have the ability to have it do some balancing, and if it sees some different performance metrics that I've set not being met, it'll actually move some of my virtual machines from, let's say, one host to another. It is sort of an automation tool that helps me. Basically, I specify the metric, and if I get a certain host or something being over-utilized, it'll automatically move the virtual machines around for me. It basically has to snap into my vCenter and then it can make adjustments and move my virtual machines around. It also has some very nice reporting tools built around virtual machines. It tells you how much storage, memory, or CPU is being used monthly, and then it gives you a very nice way to be able to send out billing structure to your end users who use servers within your environment.""It also brings up a list of machines and if something is under-provisioned and needs more compute power it will tell you, 'This server needs more compute power, and we suggest you raise it up to this level.' It will even automatically do it for you. In Azure, you don't have to actually go into the cloud provider to resize. You can just say, 'Apply these resizes,' and Turbonomic uses some back-end APIs to make the changes for you.""The automated memory balancing, where it looks at whether it's being used in the most efficient way and adds or takes away memory, is the best part. If it didn't do that, it would be something that I would have to do. We have too many machines for one person to do that. The automation helps me in that it is done in a really efficient way and a balanced way because of the policies. It really helps.""It has automated a lot of things. We have saved 30 to 35 percent in human resource time and cost, which is pretty substantial. We don't have a big workforce here, so we have to use all the automation we can get.""The proactive monitoring of all our open enrollment applications has improved our organization. We have used it to size applications that we are moving to the cloud. Therefore, when we move them out there, we have them appropriately sized. We use it for reporting to current application owners, showing them where they are wasting money. There are easy things to find for an application, e.g., they decommissioned the server, but they never took care of the storage. Without a tool like this, that storage would just sit there forever, with us getting billed for it.""Turbonomic has helped optimize cloud operations and reduced our cloud costs significantly. Overall, we are at about 40 percent savings, and we spend about three million a year just in Azure. It reduces the size of the VMs, putting them into the right template for usage. People don't realize that you don't have to future-proof a virtual machine in Azure. You just need to build it for today. As the business or service grows, you can scale up or out. About 90 percent of all the costs that we've reduced has been from sizing machines appropriately.""We have a system where our developers automate machine builds, and that is constantly running out of resources. Turbonomic helps us with that, so I don't have to keep buying hardware. The developers always say, "They don't have enough. They don't have enough. They don't have enough," when they just configured it improperly. Therefore, Turbonomic helps us identify configuration issues on their side so it doesn't cost me money on the other end to buy resources that I don't really need."

More Turbonomic Pros »

"I am very satisfied with the technical support.""The most valuable features are the dashboards.""Since we began using Nutanix the performance for virtual desktops is much better.""The GUI and the dashboard are impressive. I like that you can modify the GUI and the dashboard as per your requirements.""The centralized management of Nutanix Prism is the best feature.""The storage management is one of the best.""The Clone and Snapshot features are two of the most valuable aspects of the solution for our organization. Rather than simply one-click automation the Snapshot and reverse Snapshot are great.""Aside from ease of use, scalability is one of the key points of this solution."

More Nutanix Prism Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the support for monitoring Cisco switches.""The implementation process is very straightforward.""The most valuable feature is the alert and alarm monitoring.""The best thing about Zabbix is the integration and the APIs that are included are very fast""The integration capabilities and APIs are the best part.""Zabbix is both stable and scalable.""The flexible licensing model is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. It really allows for great flexibility for companies.""The most valuable feature is monitoring."

More Zabbix Pros »

Cons
"It would be good for Turbonomic, on their side, to integrate with other companies like AppDynamics or SolarWinds or other monitoring softwares. I feel that the actual monitoring of applications, mixed in with their abilities, would help. That would be the case wherever Turbonomic lacks the ability to monitor an application or in cases where applications are so customized that it's not going to be able to handle them. There is monitoring that you can do with scripting that you may not be able to do with Turbonomic.""It sometimes does get false positives. Sometimes, it'll move something when it really wasn't a performance metric. I've seen it do that, but it's pretty much an automated tool for performance. We've only got about 500 virtual machines, so lots of times, I'm able to manage it physically, but it's definitely a nice tool for a larger enterprise that might be managing 2,000 or 3,000 virtual machines.""There is room for improvement [with] upgrades. We have deployed the newer version, version 8 of Turbonomic. The problem is that there is no way to upgrade between major Turbonomic versions. You can upgrade minor versions without a problem, but when you go from version 6 to version 7, or version 7 to version 8, you basically have to deploy it new and let it start gathering data again. That is a problem because all of the data, all of the savings calculations that had been done on the old version, are gone. There's no way to keep track of your lifetime savings across versions.""The planning and costing areas could be a little bit more detailed. When you have more than 2,000 machines, the reports don't work properly. They need to fix it so that the reports work when you use that many virtual machines.""There are a few things that we did notice. It does kind of seem to run away from itself a little bit. It does seem to have a mind of its own sometimes. It goes out there and just kind of goes crazy. There needs to be something that kind of throttles things back a little bit. I have personally seen where we've been working on things, then pulled servers out of the VMware cluster and found that Turbonomic was still trying to ship resources to and from that node. So, there has to be some kind of throttling or ability for it to not be so buggy in that area. Because we've pulled nodes out of a cluster into maintenance mode, then brought it back up, and it tried to put workloads on that outside of a cluster. There may be something that is available for this, but it seems very kludgy to me.""The issue for us with the automation is we are considering starting to do the hot adds, but there are some problems with Windows Server 2019 and hot adds. It is a little buggy. So, if we turn that on with a cluster that has a lot of Windows 2019 Servers, then we would see a blue screen along with a lot of applications as well. Depending on what you are adding, cores or memory, it doesn't necessarily even take advantage of that at that moment. A reboot may be required, and we can't do that until later. So, that decreases the benefit of the real-time. For us, there is a lot of risk with real-time.""I would love to see Turbonomic analyze backup data. We have had people in the past put servers into daily full backups with seven-year retention and where the disk size is two terabytes. So, every single day, there is a two terabyte snapshot put into a Blob somewhere. I would love to see Turbonomic say, "Here are all your backups along with the age of them," to help us manage the savings by not having us spend so much on the storage in Azure. That would be huge.""They could add a few more reports. They could also be a bit more granular. While they have reports, sometimes it is hard to figure out what you are looking for just by looking at the date."

More Turbonomic Cons »

"Perhaps the interface can be more intuitive.""In the next release, I would like the ability to browse data stores.""The main area where an improvement could be made would be the pricing.""The automation needs to be improved, as there are several challenges.""I think that the Nutanix Prism Pro the terms it uses, it's not very user-friendly.""The price could be improved.""The solution could be a bit more user-friendly. The dashboard and configuration should be much easier to use.""Although this solution has very good analytics capabilities, it can be even more granular."

More Nutanix Prism Cons »

"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have.""The server monitoring could be better.""If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice.""The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities.""For us, the initial setup was complex""The documentation could be improved.""Having a more customizable interface and dashboard would be an improvement.""I would like to remotely connect to the computer, and Zabbix doesn't have this capability."

More Zabbix Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does.""It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year.""I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive.""We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective.""When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for.""I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault.""It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive.""The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice »

"A lot of my customers complain about the price of renewals, so I think that this can be improved.""Compared to VMware, the price of this solution is great.""Nutanix Prism is priced better than some of the competing solutions.""This product is cheaper than using VMware."

More Nutanix Prism Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I was using the free, Community Edition.""We purchased Zabbix for a good price, including support""We are using the free, open-source version.""It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge.""This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable.""Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it.""My manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything.""This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

More Zabbix Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will… more »
Top Answer: There is an opportunity for improvement with some of Turbonomic's permissions internally for role-based access control… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use it as a cost reduction tool regarding our cloud spend in Azure, as far as performance optimization or… more »
Top Answer: I like the general usability for general configuration. It is sufficient for everyday operations.
Top Answer: When compared with VMware, it is an overpriced solution for basic features, but for a highly complex project, its price… more »
Top Answer: The life cycle management or LCM feature is the most complicated. It takes really long and is unpredictable for our use… more »
Top Answer: The pricing of the product is reasonable.
Top Answer: The pricing is very reasonable. Zabbix is very cheap. Compared to other tools like Nagios and others, Zabbix is very… more »
Top Answer: It's open-source software, and due to that, they really don't have legacy service monitorings like APM, or build-on… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
VMTurbo Operations Manager
Learn More
Overview

Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides Application Resource Management (ARM) software used by customers to assure application performance* and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multicloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers and managed services providers.

For further information, please visit www.turbonomic.com

www.turbonomic.com/resources/case-studies

Nutanix makes infrastructure invisible, elevating IT to focus on the applications and services that power their business. The Nutanix enterprise cloud platform leverages web-scale engineering and consumer-grade design to natively converge compute, virtualization and storage into a resilient, software-defined solution with rich machine intelligence. The result is predictable performance, cloud-like infrastructure consumption, robust security, and seamless application mobility for a broad range of enterprise applications.

Zabbix is the ultimate enterprise-level software designed for real-time monitoring of millions of metrics collected from tens of thousands of servers, virtual machines and network devices. Zabbix is Open Source and comes at no cost.

Offer
Learn more about Turbonomic
Learn more about Nutanix Prism
Learn more about Zabbix
Sample Customers
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, ANZ, Credit Suisse, State Street, Morningstar, VOYA, TPICAP, LPL Financial, Cisco, BMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Agilysys, MetLife, Hiscox, Humana, Tokio Marine, Allscripts, SHARP, Providence St. Joseph Health, NBC Universal, pwc, KPMG, Wayfair, Carhartt, Tiffany & Co., UCLA, NASA, NIH
JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
Bodybuilding.com, LLC., ITtelligent Consulting Services,Eltele AS, Total Server Solutions, LLC., ChinaNetCloud
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Manufacturing Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider23%
Wholesaler/Distributor5%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company19%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company25%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise51%
Large Enterprise31%
REVIEWERS
Small Business59%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise24%
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Prism vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Nutanix Prism is ranked 4th in Virtualization Management Tools with 16 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 36 reviews. Nutanix Prism is rated 8.8, while Zabbix is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix Prism writes "Simple to upgrade, no downtime, and the performance flow charts are excellent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Very mature, easy to scale, and free to use". Nutanix Prism is most compared with Cisco UCS Manager, HPE OneView, VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront, Equinix IBX SmartView and Nutanix Prism Pro, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Nagios XI, Centreon, Splunk, SolarWinds NPM and Nagios Core. See our Nutanix Prism vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.