Objective ECM vs Oracle Content Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Objective ECM and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.
Top Answer:Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration.
Top Answer:We use Content Management to supervise and control document access within our management structure. This involves establishing measures to efficiently manage and govern the content. Our approach… more »
Ranking
Views
590
Comparisons
539
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
851
Comparisons
750
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud
Learn More
Overview

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Sample Customers
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government35%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Government14%
Computer Software Company12%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise61%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Objective ECM is ranked 16th in Enterprise Content Management while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Objective ECM is rated 4.0, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.