Compare Octopus Authenticator vs. RSA Adaptive Authentication

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
43rd
Views
89
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
Views
1,032
Comparisons
664
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

The Octopus Passwordless Enterprise™ technology provides secure passwordless authentication with a unified user experience from workstation to cloud, covering all Enterprise use cases including remote access, cloud access, privileged accounts, legacy applications and SaaS services.

The Octopus Authenticator “touch and go” experience means that users will never have to create, remember or change another password while dramatically reducing operational and support costs.

https://doubleoctopus.com/

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
Offer
Learn more about Octopus Authenticator
Learn more about RSA Adaptive Authentication
Sample Customers
United Technologies (UTC), American Family Association, ASL Airlines France, BNP Paribas, A Fortune 50 Bank, Bingham County Idaho, Britannia Financial Services, Carolina Behavioral Health Alliance LLC, European Commission, County of Midland Michigan, JRM Construction Management, Greer Commission of Public Works, Poste Italiane, Kennedy Wilson Europe, Key Mechanical, Marker Therapeutics Inc, Mediawan, Ministero Dell'interno, FairPrice, NTUC Health, Mercatus, TBC, Techni-Photo, Tinsa Group, Yates Law, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Z-Medica Corporation, A Member of the 5 largest US law firms.
ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm26%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise86%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: July 2021.
522,946 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Octopus Authenticator is ranked 43rd in Authentication Systems while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 16th in Authentication Systems. Octopus Authenticator is rated 0.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Octopus Authenticator is most compared with HYPR, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, IBM Trusteer, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Duo Security.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.