We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and Proxmox VE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"We are happy with Proxmox VE. We use it as part of a cluster."
"It allows us to create an individual VM along with the GPU for machine learning."
"Proxmox allows us to achieve affordable performance while keeping high levels of data protection and flexibility."
"The template option allows us to build a desktop in a VM, then quickly deploy as a linked clone."
"The solution is stable."
"Ease of use, HA, internal 100gbps Virtio network, built-in backup (don't pay $1200 Veeam licence), support for multi-monitors on multiple VMs in KVM, no need to RDP in the VMs to do your stuff (Win, Linux and Mac with SPICE and using 6 screens here (11520*2160)."
"That the product is free and still has all the features you expect is a huge benefit."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its storage container, LVM, and everything else work out of the box."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud. It would be nice if they made it more robust there."
"Proxmox VE needs to make a deal with Veeam. I was also unable to make version upgrades. I have also encountered backup problems."
"The solution needs a better billing system."
"A feature which should be added is the ability to encrypt the main installation."
"The solution should include some features that can help with converting raw files into different formats. It should offer better management around raw files."
"Currently, there are several features inaccessible through the API, necessitating the use of either the WebUI or the command line interface."
"Separate physical network for Corosync/Heartbeat should be emphasized in the Quick Start or Getting Started documentation."
"The product is still a little young so it is maturing, but new features are coming out all the time."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews while Proxmox VE is ranked 1st in Server Virtualization Software with 58 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while Proxmox VE is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proxmox VE writes "Easy to use and supports multi-monitors on multiple VMs in KVM". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere, whereas Proxmox VE is most compared with VMware vSphere, Oracle VM VirtualBox, KVM, Hyper-V and oVirt.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.