We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The connectivity is fantastic, and many functions can run together in one server. If you need to scale, we can continue to add components or modules. It's a beautiful virtual solution that has many advantages over physical hardware, where you have to use devices and wiring to connect all your projects."
"I use the ESXi a lot for my users to create their own templates and control their own VMs without my interaction."
"Valuable features really depend on different projects. We are using the traditional infrastructure based on VMware vSphere. We are also using the high availability (HA) and Distributed Switch features to extend our network and switch between different hosts. The VMotion and SVMotion features are very essential for us to relocate the storage of virtual machines to different storage or vSANs. We are using VMotion and SVMotion features several times of the day. We are also using another VMware product to replicate a lot of solutions to a second replication site."
"I like the capability of vMotion, DRS, high availability, and resource distribution."
"Cross vendor integration is in my opinion one of the best features."
"It is a very mature solution that is easy to use and flexible."
"VMware vSphere has very good applications and services."
"We are able to create virtual machines and move them from one host to another, controlling the resources."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"We previously had a hard time using tech support."
"They should make it more efficient and stable."
"The initial setup is quite complex."
"There needs to be more integration overall. That would be quite helpful."
"I would like to see the UI incorporating all of the functionality that the thick client had."
"The solution could be cheaper and less expensive."
"When it comes to cross-regional (e.g., someone in the US managing the China vSphere implementations), it can be a somewhat slow. I would recommend increasing the speed. While there has already been improvement there, I would like to see more."
"The installation is complex and you need to have a good understanding in regards to what you are doing when you are setting it up."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Proxmox VE, Hyper-V and KVM, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and KVM.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.