We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Okta Workforce Identity vs. Perimeter 81

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Enabled MFA to access federated applications as well as increased user satisfaction through improved provisioning times and more reliable processes.""The initial setup is easy.""The ease of deployment, ease of use, and speed of delivery is what I like about Okta Workforce Identity. It is very easy to use. For a lot of software, you need to be trained extensively and have a very technical background. Okta Workforce Identity is quite simple. You can integrate any software into Okta. They've got a network of 7,000 applications that easily integrate into it.""Having a single sign-on to all our applications.""It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do.""The MFA part is the best. MFA provided most of the security that we were looking at with respect to the second level of authentication. Okta Workforce Identity provides a number of options with respect to multifactor authentication, such as the app, phone call, and text. These options provide different ways of logging in for users, and they were a lot more than what we needed. This is certainly a very good feature of Okta Workforce Identity.""The solution so far has been very stable.""The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."

More Okta Workforce Identity Pros »

"Their split tunneling feature has been very valuable to our company since implementing the Perimeter 81 solution."

More Perimeter 81 Pros »

Cons
"It can have more API integrations.""The pricing could be improved.""You can't hide the device when you're checking logs.""SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service.""The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved.""There are some issues with the interface that can be improved.""It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it.""The solution can be quite expensive."

More Okta Workforce Identity Cons »

"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."

More Perimeter 81 Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"License is around US$20,000 annually.""It has a yearly subscription. As compared to its competitors, it is quite expensive. It also has a complex licensing model.""The price of this product could be lower.""It could be a bit too pricey for small companies. Okta Workforce Identity can add a lot of benefits, but smaller companies may not have a lot of applications that need to be managed by Okta Workforce Identity. In larger organizations, there are more departments, applications, and users to manage. Okta Workforce Identity adds a bit more value to those bigger organizations. In addition to standard licensing fees, there are also additional costs for things""It is costly for large companies.""I believe it competes well. The pricing is pretty competitive. I know that Microsoft also provides something similar with its MFA and identity services."

More Okta Workforce Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

More Perimeter 81 Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution so far has been very stable.
Top Answer: We pay for the solution on a yearly basis. We recognize it as quite expensive. We were using a standard license during the trial. We felt that we would get more features. However, there were some… more »
Top Answer: Okta can consider to become also a password vaulting manager. We also didn't find an option to setup access to web services that require second factor authentication. Also it's hard to figure out… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 26 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
22,919
Comparisons
18,809
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
451
Rating
8.7
7th
out of 26 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
2,162
Comparisons
1,646
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
433
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Okta is an enterprise grade identity management service, built from the ground up in the cloud and delivered with an unwavering focus on customer success. With Okta, IT can manage access across any application, person or device. Whether the people are employees, partners or customers or the applications are in the cloud, on-premises or on a mobile device, Okta helps IT become more secure, make people more productive, and maintain compliance. Okta is an on-demand identity and access management service for web based applications, both in the cloud and behind the firewall.

Perimeter 81 is a Zero Trust Network as a Service helping organizations to secure their network, cloud and application access, and protect their most valuable resources. Incorporating the highest standards of Zero Trust Security, Perimeter 81 seamlessly applies adaptive policies, based on device, identity and location, so that only authorized users are granted access to critical corporate resources. A pioneer in software-defined access technology, Perimeter 81 is among the first solution that can fully secure access to both managed and unmanaged devices. Unlike traditional hardware-based network security providers, Perimeter 81 provides greater network visibility, seamless on-boarding and automatic integration with all the major cloud providers. Furthermore, the solution can be fully deployed across a company’s network in less than 15 minutes, giving companies of all industries and sizes the power to be securely mobile and completely cloud-confident.

Offer
Learn more about Okta Workforce Identity
Learn more about Perimeter 81
Sample Customers
Box, Groupon, National Geographic, Western Union, DocuSign
Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company23%
Healthcare Company15%
Computer Software Company15%
Comms Service Provider15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Financial Services Firm5%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise64%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 14 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 7th in ZTNA as a Service with 1 review. Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Perimeter 81 is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Good product with ease of deployment, ease of use, speed of delivery, and easy integration with other software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Affordable, secure, and allows me to manage all user access in one platform". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Azure Active Directory, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Auth0 and OneLogin Workforce Identity, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Zscaler SASE, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato Networks and Pulse Secure Pulse SDP.

See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.