We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"The product is easy to use."
"It offers very helpful support. The technical team is very helpful."
"It is a very stable solution."
"What I found most valuable in Okta Workforce Identity is that it worked together with VMware Workspace One, so there was this device check at the same time. My company used the trusted device method that enabled you to define that only the trusted devices including the Workspace One agent were able to access the applications directly without an additional authentication step."
"One of the most beneficial features of the solution is the user provisioning and the de-provisioning feature."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."
"On the admin side, we can create our own passwords instead of generating one, which is usually difficult to explain to a user."
"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."
"Application updates are lacking. Customer support needs to be improved."
"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."
"UD attribute mapping, Okta group rules, and dynamic usage could use improvement. It also needs more in-depth functionality and features to integrate with RADIUS solutions."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The initial setup can be complex at first."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Auth0 and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.