Compare One Identity Active Roles vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Active Roles vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want.""It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"Having a tool to manage all changes to AD from a single pane of glass is awesome.""The biggest thing for us is Active Roles saves a lot of man-hours in keeping groups up-to-date manually or trying to write some sort of script that you have to run, so we don't have to reinvent the wheel. Instead of when every time somebody joins a department, then somebody has to remember to put in a request to add "meet user Joe" to this group, the solution does it automatically for us. Therefore, it saves our business and IT staff time because they do not have to process requests since Active Role can do it for them.""Because of Active Roles, we're able to synchronize on an even more regular basis. It enables us to provide even more information to the Active Directory, which helped us to group our users in a more consistent manner.""Another good feature is the change history. It's centralized in a single place and allows us to manage people's Active Directory domains from a central location. We can also drill down into individual objects in a troubleshooting or even an auditing situation. We can show evidence to auditors by drilling down into the individual history. It gives you all the history of what happened around an individual object. That is something that would be almost impossible to do in Active Directory, or extremely complicated.""With the use of the sync service we were able to import information from multiple external systems and populate them within our space and leverage them for downstream systems."

More One Identity Active Roles Pros »

"We like the integration with other systems.""The compliance features are the most valuable features.""The community is very active and when I had questions about an issue, I was able to find the resources.""The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle.""The solution is stable and reliable.""Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable.""It provides a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities. You don't have to do too much custom development like other solutions such as Microsoft or NetIQ. It also has a lot of out-of-the-box connectors for different sources, directories, databases, etc. Its cloud version is working very well, and its pricing is okay. Its value for money is fine for most of the customers. It is also very flexible. They have frequent new releases and patches for fixing errors and things like that.""The most valuable feature for our customers and for us is the identity data warehouse."

More SailPoint IdentityIQ Pros »

Cons
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides.""Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"The ability to send logs to a SIEM would be very beneficial.""When doing a workflow, we would like a bit better feedback on the screen, as we're trying to get it to work. For example, there is a "Find" function that you need set up in a workflow to do some of the automation. It is not the easiest to get a result from those finds when you're trying to do that. In the MMC, they have a couple different types of workflows. In this particular case, we use their workflow functionality to find all of X within the environment, then if you find it, do X, Y, and Z. You can have multiple steps. When you do that search function within that workflow, it's really hard to find out, "Is my search working?" It would be nice if there was some feedback on the screen so you could see if your search is working properly within the workflow.""In terms of improvement, it could be made even more user-friendly for administrators when they need to create new workflows and rule sets.""The third area for improvement, which is the weakest portion of ARS, is the workflow engine, which was introduced a few years ago. It's slow and not very intuitive to use, so I would like to see improvement there.""There are some features that we think should be included in their next release. We think these things would take them to the next level: the ability to completely force or limit any dynamic group processing to specific servers, change-tracking reporting of virtual attributes, and the ability to use files as inputs to automation workloads. These things have also been talked about. Knowing them, they're probably working on them."

More One Identity Active Roles Cons »

"I would like to see more Cloud management from this product.""They should lower the price and technical support should be better.""The interface should be simple and easier to use.""Compared to at least one other product some of the administrative tasks could be easier or more intuitive.""The connectors are far too manual. This needs to be automated a bit.""The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great. In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added.""They can work on their strategy for the on-premise version. They have to decide whether and for how long they will support the on-premise version. The new features first appear in the cloud, and after that, they are released for the on-premise version. In the cloud, you have more options and flexibility, which is absolutely normal. They have to have a clear strategy regarding whether they'll support the on-premises version with the same focus. The licensing for on-premise and cloud is a little bit different. They can make it the same.""The report functionality and dashboard of the access manager could be improved."

More SailPoint IdentityIQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high.""It is licensed per managed user per year."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""You do pay one price for the license but that price depends on what you choose to include as far as the optional modules go.""SailPoint is higher in price as compared to Saviynt. The initial cost of SailPoint is very high. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees.""Its price is okay. It provides good value for money. It is subscription-based. You can go for a one-year or three-year subscription.""The price of the solution could improve, it is not priced well for smaller businesses to afford."

More SailPoint IdentityIQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend… more »
Top Answer: Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is… more »
Top Answer: With the use of the sync service we were able to import information from multiple external systems and populate them… more »
Top Answer: Active Roles is above average on pricing compared to similar solutions. There are no additional costs to the standard… more »
Top Answer: We would like to see * extension of change-tracking auditing capabilities, especially in relationship to the virtual… more »
Top Answer: It provides a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities. You don't have to do too much custom development like other… more »
Top Answer: Its price is okay. It provides good value for money. It is subscription-based. You can go for a one-year or three-year… more »
Top Answer: They can work on their strategy for the on-premise version. They have to decide whether and for how long they will… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Omada Identity Suite
Quest Active Roles
IdentityIQ
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

Active Roles is a single, unified and rich tool to automate the most troublesome user and group management tasks. With One Identity Active Roles, you can streamline user and group administration, solve security issues – and meet those never-ending compliance requirements by managing and securing on-prem, and cloud AD resources simply and efficiently with a single, intuitive solution.

SailPoint is the leader in identity security for the cloud enterprise. We’re committed to protecting businesses from the inherent risk that comes with providing technology access across today’s diverse and remote workforce. Our identity security solutions secure and enable thousands of companies worldwide, giving our customers unmatched visibility into the entirety of their digital workforce, and ensuring that each worker has the right access to do their job, no more, no less. With SailPoint at the foundation of their business, our customers can provision access with confidence, protect business assets at scale and ensure compliance with certainty.

Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about One Identity Active Roles
Learn more about SailPoint IdentityIQ
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
City of Frankfurt, Moore Public Schools, George Washington University, Transavia Airlines, Howard County, MD. See all stories at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise89%
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Active Roles vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

One Identity Active Roles is ranked 3rd in User Provisioning Software with 5 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 8 reviews. One Identity Active Roles is rated 8.8, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of One Identity Active Roles writes "ARS has been instrumental in ensuring accounts get cleaned up when they get deprovisioned". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "ROI has been outstanding and our user onboarding time has been significantly decreased". One Identity Active Roles is most compared with Azure Active Directory, One Identity Manager, Okta Workforce Identity, Softerra Adaxes and Saviynt, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Identity Manager, ForgeRock, One Identity Manager and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration. See our One Identity Active Roles vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.

See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.