One Identity Defender vs RSA Authentication Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
One Identity Logo
340 views|243 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
RSA Logo
1,314 views|1,211 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between One Identity Defender and RSA Authentication Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Defender vs. RSA Authentication Manager Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.""One Identity Defender has good network protection.""We find that the product scales very well."

More One Identity Defender Pros →

"I have found RSA Authentication Manager to be scalable.""It is a good solution for token identification.""Easy setup, deployment, and integration in different infrastructures, including virtual ones.""The most valuable feature is the SecurID.""It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.""It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-maintained product with reliable performance.""The most valuable feature is the provision part. The mapping and the logging is also very good. In addition, the troubleshooting, from a console point of view, is easy for administration and on the provisioning and logging part."

More RSA Authentication Manager Pros →

Cons
"We have some clients that are wanting to protect their Apache web servers with One Identity Defender but all the research I have done says cannot be done. It can only be oriented to an IIS server. One Identity Defender should have more integration with more types of web servers.""Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It seems more focused on IIS web applications.""The login capabilities could be better."

More One Identity Defender Cons →

"Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems. This is our major aim, to be a valued product for the future. The biggest problem is to work against cheap cloud systems. Cloud identification is our main problem at this time.""We found technical support was not very responsive to our requests for assistance.""We have encountered issue when trying to expand this particular solution for a large set of users across the country.""We are not planning on using the solution in the future.""There is room for improvement in the RSA support.""Perhaps parts of the the user interface should become more intuitive.""Enhancing the user interface and expanding their marketing efforts in regions like Nigeria and West Africa could be beneficial."

More RSA Authentication Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is a little bit complicated because sometimes resellers are able to make prices that are too low. Our price, with a discount, is typically not as high as some of our competitors."
  • "As a new customer, the minimum cost would be four dollars, but you have room for negotiation, potentially bringing it down to as low as three dollars."
  • More RSA Authentication Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.
    Top Answer:Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It would be useful to focus on other web applications. For example, if an application needs to be installed on an iOS server and it's not, it… more »
    Top Answer:Our primary use cases include functions such as role-based access control, user registration, and integration with other systems. We use it to improve the security of our web applications… more »
    Top Answer:It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a… more »
    Top Answer:Enhancing the user interface and expanding their marketing efforts in regions like Nigeria and West Africa could be beneficial.
    Top Answer:We use it to enhance the security of our Cisco VPN connections and for custom-developed applications. These applications communicate with RSA via APIs, enabling us to leverage RSA's two-factor… more »
    Ranking
    16th
    Views
    340
    Comparisons
    243
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    630
    Rating
    10.0
    14th
    Views
    1,314
    Comparisons
    1,211
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    529
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ACE/Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    Defender enhances security by requiring two-factor authentication to gain access to your network resources. Defender uses your current identity store within Microsoft Active Directory (AD) to enable two-factor authentication.

    RSA Authentication Manager is the platform behind RSA SecurID that allows for centralized management of the RSA SecurID environment including authentication methods, users, applications, and agents across multiple physical sites. It verifies authentication requests and centrally administers authentication policies for organizations' end users.
    Sample Customers
    Bakersfield Police Department, Village of Westmont, Illinois
    Tiera, Fred Loya, BRE Leasing, ADP, BlueFort Security, New Hanover County
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    One Identity Defender vs. RSA Authentication Manager
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Defender vs. RSA Authentication Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    One Identity Defender is ranked 16th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews while RSA Authentication Manager is ranked 14th in Authentication Systems with 10 reviews. One Identity Defender is rated 8.6, while RSA Authentication Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of One Identity Defender writes "Good compatibility, responsive support, and a nice interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Authentication Manager writes "A highly effective and versatile solution that excels in terms of security, integration, scalability, and customer support". One Identity Defender is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas RSA Authentication Manager is most compared with Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, RSA SecurID, RSA Adaptive Authentication and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. See our One Identity Defender vs. RSA Authentication Manager report.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.