One Identity Defender vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
One Identity Logo
340 views|243 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Thales Cloud Security Logo
1,810 views|1,578 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between One Identity Defender and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We find that the product scales very well.""It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.""One Identity Defender has good network protection."

More One Identity Defender Pros →

"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP.""Scalable and stable.""We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon.""The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."

More Thales Authenticators Pros →

Cons
"The login capabilities could be better.""Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It seems more focused on IIS web applications.""We have some clients that are wanting to protect their Apache web servers with One Identity Defender but all the research I have done says cannot be done. It can only be oriented to an IIS server. One Identity Defender should have more integration with more types of web servers."

More One Identity Defender Cons →

"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture.""The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365.""The stability could improve.""Lacks integration with other platforms."

More Thales Authenticators Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.
Top Answer:Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It would be useful to focus on other web applications. For example, if an application needs to be installed on an iOS server and it's not, it… more »
Top Answer:Our primary use cases include functions such as role-based access control, user registration, and integration with other systems. We use it to improve the security of our web applications… more »
Top Answer:We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon.
Top Answer:The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365. That was the breaking point for us. The security is a little bit redundant because if you have already unlocked your phone… more »
Top Answer:We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud.
Ranking
16th
Views
340
Comparisons
243
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
630
Rating
10.0
17th
Views
1,810
Comparisons
1,578
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
406
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager
Learn More
Overview

Defender enhances security by requiring two-factor authentication to gain access to your network resources. Defender uses your current identity store within Microsoft Active Directory (AD) to enable two-factor authentication.

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Sample Customers
Bakersfield Police Department, Village of Westmont, Illinois
Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company16%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
Financial Services Firm14%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

One Identity Defender is ranked 16th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews while Thales Authenticators is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. One Identity Defender is rated 8.6, while Thales Authenticators is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of One Identity Defender writes "Good compatibility, responsive support, and a nice interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales Authenticators writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". One Identity Defender is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Thales Authenticators is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Atalla Hardware Security Module and Utimaco SecurityServer.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.