Compare One Identity Defender vs. Starling Two-Factor Authentication

One Identity Defender is ranked 44th in Authentication Systems while Starling Two-Factor Authentication is ranked 47th in Authentication Systems. One Identity Defender is rated 0, while Starling Two-Factor Authentication is rated 0. On the other hand, One Identity Defender is most compared with , whereas Starling Two-Factor Authentication is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
44th
Views
15
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
47th
Views
3
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Symantec and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: May 2020.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Starling Two Factor Authentication
Learn
One Identity
Video Not Available
One Identity
Video Not Available
Overview

Defender enhances security by requiring two-factor authentication to gain access to your network resources. Defender uses your current identity store within Microsoft Active Directory (AD) to enable two-factor authentication.

With Starling Two-Factor Authentication, a SaaS-based solution, you can secure your organization and keep users productive. It solves the password problem without the capital costs or increased infrastructure management often incurred with traditional on-premises solutions.

Offer
Learn more about One Identity Defender
Learn more about Starling Two-Factor Authentication
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Symantec and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: May 2020.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.