One Identity Defender vs Venafi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between One Identity Defender and Venafi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed One Identity Defender vs. Venafi Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.""One Identity Defender has good network protection.""We find that the product scales very well."

More One Identity Defender Pros →

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates.""The feature that I have found most valuable is their certificate discovery.""Automating anything, whether on-prem or cloud, is possible."

More Venafi Pros →

Cons
"Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It seems more focused on IIS web applications.""The login capabilities could be better.""We have some clients that are wanting to protect their Apache web servers with One Identity Defender but all the research I have done says cannot be done. It can only be oriented to an IIS server. One Identity Defender should have more integration with more types of web servers."

More One Identity Defender Cons →

"I would like to see included in the next release of Venafi integration with the cloud HSM's, Hardware Security Module. Additionally, I would say other cloud services, because it's not only cloud that's essential. If you have a customer that has a lot of their IT moved into cloud, integration with different cloud services is always an area to improve.""Venafi's overall installation could be made easier.""Currently lacks the capability to automatically download certificates in JKS."

More Venafi Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.
Top Answer:Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It would be useful to focus on other web applications. For example, if an application needs to be installed on an iOS server and it's not, it… more »
Top Answer:Our primary use cases include functions such as role-based access control, user registration, and integration with other systems. We use it to improve the security of our web applications… more »
Top Answer:We use Venafi for PKI certificates.
Top Answer:Venafi's overall installation could be made easier. You have to install the client, then go to the console and push the certificate.
Top Answer:Venafi has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other certificate deployment products. I would recommend Venafi to other users. Overall, I rate Venafi an eight out… more »
Ranking
16th
Views
360
Comparisons
259
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
630
Rating
10.0
18th
Views
684
Comparisons
401
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
301
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Defender enhances security by requiring two-factor authentication to gain access to your network resources. Defender uses your current identity store within Microsoft Active Directory (AD) to enable two-factor authentication.

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.
Sample Customers
Bakersfield Police Department, Village of Westmont, Illinois
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company16%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
One Identity Defender vs. Venafi
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Defender vs. Venafi and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

One Identity Defender is ranked 16th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews while Venafi is ranked 18th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. One Identity Defender is rated 10.0, while Venafi is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of One Identity Defender writes "Good compatibility, responsive support, and a nice interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venafi writes "The solution has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other products". One Identity Defender is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Venafi is most compared with DigiCert PKI Platform, AppViewX CERT+, Entrust Identity Enterprise and Cisco Duo. See our One Identity Defender vs. Venafi report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.