Compare One Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance

One Identity Manager is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 31 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 4th in Identity Management (IM) with 7 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "Automation simplifies multiple-account and role management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "It has a quick response time but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability". One Identity Manager is most compared with CyberArk PAS, SailPoint IdentityIQ and One Identity Active Roles, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, CyberArk PAS and Okta. See our One Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It gives the best user experience, enabling us an overview of all user entitlements.This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights.The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen.The connection with multiple systems is what makes it flexible. We can create the accounts flexibly, enabling access to other systems. In addition to Active Directory, it can extend to SAP, to Salesforce, to Office 365, etc.Nobody has to put people in AD groups by hand anymore. It goes automatically and that's very good. It's also very flexible. It's quite easy to customize and we have customized it a lot.For me, personally, the automation is the most valuable feature. I don't have to do things manually, like creating user accounts and provisioning them to the target systems.This is almost a complete solution for us.The business role management feature is pretty good because we have a lot of dynamic roles, and you can configure it with the filters.

Read more »

The solution is quite stable once you are able to overcome the bugsIt has a very good response time.This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding.The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks.Its most valuable feature is its scalability.OIM in my organization has improved its use and dependability, allowing us to pass audit each time.The proactive controls which can be configured to a granular level allowing the organization the flexibility to meet the changing demands of the workforce.

Read more »

Cons
The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult.The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long.A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly.More integration with SAP and with the internet of things would be good. We also have system devices that we could manage as identities, so that would be a feature to add.One of the things we would like is the ability to have more than one system role manager. That would be nice. For example, when people are on vacation, sometimes it gets a little hard to administrate system roles.The system role manager, or some of the roles that are inside Identity Manager, are limited to one user. It would be more flexible if these responsibility roles could be attached to many people.It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal.Make the logging and debugging easier to find, because I'm always confused, "Where do I have to go to turn this log on if I want to see it?"

Read more »

The initial setup is quite complex. The user interface is just awful. It's not user-friendly or intuitive at all.It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability.Simplify & add more functionality to Identity Cloud Service (IDCS).You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement.They need to improve their backup strategy.Automation of validation exercises performed by humans over Recon Exceptions generated as a result of an access synchronization event over a user's need for access or not.I have yet to see its full functionality exercised in my organization.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee.It's costlier that some other products, and there is nothing that fits every solution.We are using a self-built solution. It would cost too much to get that up to the standard of what we need. In the long-term, it is cheaper to buy a solution that has what we need. Though, we are still running the previous solution, as we are still in the implementation phase.It needs flexibility in the licensing or packaging, because you buy the entire package at once, and sometimes the customers are a bit overwhelmed with whatever they get. I would like if they could cut the licensing or packaging into somewhat smaller things.It has helped to reduce customer costs.We are paying for premium support, which is expensive. However, we do receive very good, fast support.It helps us save on licenses for applications because we are following the account lifecycle, as well as account reactivation.We have the premium support and are very satisfied. They are always answer our questions very quickly. For the moment, we are very satisfied, but I think it's because we are paying for the premium support.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
Views
7,546
Comparisons
4,155
Reviews
31
Average Words per Review
614
Avg. Rating
8.0
4th
Views
3,238
Comparisons
2,317
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
329
Avg. Rating
7.6
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Quest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity ManagerOracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite
Learn
One Identity
Oracle
Overview

One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff.

Oracle Identity Governance reduces the total cost of ownership for organizations by empowering user self-service, simplifying audit and compliance tasks and automating IT operations. By delivering a comprehensive platform for access request, role lifecycle management, access certification, closed loop remediation and privileged account management, Oracle Identity Governance is a solution that address today's requirements and enables organizations to quickly adapt to emerging requirements. Oracle Identity Governance suite provides many benefits, including: Increased end user productivity, Increased IT productivity and automation of provisioning tasks, accelerated useronboarding and stringent controls over sensitive access to shared privileged accounts, Reduced total cost and risk and Increased efficiency.

Offer
Learn more about One Identity Manager
Learn more about Oracle Identity Governance
Sample Customers
Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm10%
University10%
Comms Service Provider10%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company15%
Comms Service Provider15%
Software R&D Company10%
Government10%
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email