Anonymous UserDirector, Global Identity and Access Technologies at a financial services firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."
"Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want."
"It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly."
"The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen."
"It gives the best user experience, enabling us an overview of all user entitlements."
"This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights."
"The short version is that we gained significant insight into the issues of access governance. This allowed us to turn an auditing nightmare into praise from our auditors."
"The most valuable features include the automated attestations or recertification... The time that people have to focus on their real jobs and not spend it doing recertifications is huge."
"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."
"The governance aspect in general is great."
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement."
"When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version."
"The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly."
"The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult."
"The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long."
"The support team could be improved on. The first level of support essentially looks up knowledge base articles and often can't provide the answer needed."
"[Regarding] their upgrades, we're going to 8.12 right now and everything is running very smoothly but this is actually the first upgrade that has gone off well. Even the other "dots" have taken us six months or longer to get through QA testing."
"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."
"the user interface could be slightly improved."
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."
"It is licensed per managed user per year."
"There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee."
"From a cost perspective, One Identity has the biggest bang for the buck."
"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"
Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.
One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff.
One Identity Manager is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 4 reviews while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 12th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.6, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "Enables us to automate SOX recertification, saving a significant amount of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Active Roles and Oracle Identity Governance, whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Oracle Identity Governance, Saviynt and ForgeRock. See our One Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.