Compare One Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want.""It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen.""It gives the best user experience, enabling us an overview of all user entitlements.""This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights.""The short version is that we gained significant insight into the issues of access governance. This allowed us to turn an auditing nightmare into praise from our auditors.""The most valuable features include the automated attestations or recertification... The time that people have to focus on their real jobs and not spend it doing recertifications is huge."

More One Identity Manager Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.""The governance aspect in general is great."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pros »

Cons
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides.""Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly.""The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult.""The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long.""The support team could be improved on. The first level of support essentially looks up knowledge base articles and often can't provide the answer needed.""[Regarding] their upgrades, we're going to 8.12 right now and everything is running very smoothly but this is actually the first upgrade that has gone off well. Even the other "dots" have taken us six months or longer to get through QA testing."

More One Identity Manager Cons »

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved.""the user interface could be slightly improved."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high.""It is licensed per managed user per year."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee.""From a cost perspective, One Identity has the biggest bang for the buck."

More One Identity Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend… more »
Top Answer: Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable features include the automated attestations or recertification... The time that people have to focus… more »
Top Answer: There is room for improvement to their password self-service tool. We're actually leaving that tool right now because… more »
Top Answer: One of the key use cases is certifications for SOX applications. Another is centralized onboarding and offboarding… more »
Top Answer: This solution lacks a closed-loop, which causes issues. If on one day (by a single user) multiple requests as submitted… more »
Top Answer: We use this solution to automate lifecycle governance and for role-based access control administration. Within our… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Omada Identity Suite
Quest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity Manager
SecurID
Learn More
Omada
Video Not Available
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff.

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about One Identity Manager
Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm40%
Healthcare Company12%
University8%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.

One Identity Manager is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 4 reviews while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 12th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.6, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "Enables us to automate SOX recertification, saving a significant amount of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Active Roles and Oracle Identity Governance, whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Oracle Identity Governance, Saviynt and ForgeRock. See our One Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.