Compare One Identity Manager vs. SAP Identity Management
One Identity Manager is ranked 1st in Identity Management (IM) with 32 reviews while SAP Identity Management is ranked 9th in Identity Management (IM) with 3 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while SAP Identity Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "Enables us to automate SOX recertification, saving a significant amount of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Identity Management writes "Automatic user provisioning is valuable but could use better cloud integration connectors". One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, CyberArk PAS, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), One Identity Active Roles and ARCON Privileged Access Management, whereas SAP Identity Management is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Identity Manager, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration, CyberArk PAS and PingID. See our One Identity Manager vs. SAP Identity Management report.
Sponsored | ||
Most Helpful Review | ||||||
Use Omada Identity Suite? Share your opinion. |
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. SAP Identity Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2020. 431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | ||
The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology. The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships. | The most valuable features include the automated attestations or recertification... The time that people have to focus on their real jobs and not spend it doing recertifications is huge. The short version is that we gained significant insight into the issues of access governance. This allowed us to turn an auditing nightmare into praise from our auditors. It gives the best user experience, enabling us an overview of all user entitlements. This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights. The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen. The connection with multiple systems is what makes it flexible. We can create the accounts flexibly, enabling access to other systems. In addition to Active Directory, it can extend to SAP, to Salesforce, to Office 365, etc. Nobody has to put people in AD groups by hand anymore. It goes automatically and that's very good. It's also very flexible. It's quite easy to customize and we have customized it a lot. For me, personally, the automation is the most valuable feature. I don't have to do things manually, like creating user accounts and provisioning them to the target systems. | It provides basic automatic user administration and role provisioning to save time. Rather than implement a basic SSO, this solution assisted us with setting up two-factor authentication. The most valuable feature is the user experience for managing information. |
Cons | ||
When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version. The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement. | [Regarding] their upgrades, we're going to 8.12 right now and everything is running very smoothly but this is actually the first upgrade that has gone off well. Even the other "dots" have taken us six months or longer to get through QA testing. The support team could be improved on. The first level of support essentially looks up knowledge base articles and often can't provide the answer needed. The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult. The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long. A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly. More integration with SAP and with the internet of things would be good. We also have system devices that we could manage as identities, so that would be a feature to add. One of the things we would like is the ability to have more than one system role manager. That would be nice. For example, when people are on vacation, sometimes it gets a little hard to administrate system roles. The system role manager, or some of the roles that are inside Identity Manager, are limited to one user. It would be more flexible if these responsibility roles could be attached to many people. | A lack of startup connectors to different systems, and could have better connectors for SAP IDM. It needs to have the SSO for the HANA modules that SAP is releasing. Research and marketing need to be improved. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
Information Not Available | From a cost perspective, One Identity has the biggest bang for the buck. There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee. It's costlier that some other products, and there is nothing that fits every solution. We are using a self-built solution. It would cost too much to get that up to the standard of what we need. In the long-term, it is cheaper to buy a solution that has what we need. Though, we are still running the previous solution, as we are still in the implementation phase. It needs flexibility in the licensing or packaging, because you buy the entire package at once, and sometimes the customers are a bit overwhelmed with whatever they get. I would like if they could cut the licensing or packaging into somewhat smaller things. It has helped to reduce customer costs. We are paying for premium support, which is expensive. However, we do receive very good, fast support. It helps us save on licenses for applications because we are following the account lifecycle, as well as account reactivation. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs. 431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 37% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. | Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 30% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time. Compared 10% of the time. Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Identity Suite | Quest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity Manager | SAP NetWeaver Identity Management, NetWeaver Identity Management |
Learn | ||
| Omada | One Identity | SAP |
Overview  | ||
Omada Identity Suite Core identity management and access governance functionality in one integrated solution. High-Level Identity Management and Access Governance Functionality Omada's Identity Suite delivers a fully featured process framework for core identity management and access governance functionalities, that improves IT security, ensures compliance control, and enables business efficiency. | One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff. | Reduce risk and centrally manage user access across your enterprise – with SAP Identity Management. The software integrates with your business processes to provide robust data and application security. Keep your operations running smoothly – and boost productivity by providing role-based user access, self-service password reset, approval workflows, and more. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Omada Identity Suite | Learn more about One Identity Manager | Learn more about SAP Identity Management |
Sample Customers | ||
| ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, Krka, Bayer, NuStar Energy, DuPont | Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies | State of Indiana, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Alliander N.V., Chemion Logistik GmbH, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) |
Top Industries | ||
Computer Software Company49% Comms Service Provider12% Government6% Media Company5% | Financial Services Firm42% Healthcare Company13% Manufacturing Company13% Pharma/Biotech Company8% Computer Software Company33% Comms Service Provider13% Media Company6% Financial Services Firm6% | Computer Software Company44% Government12% Retailer9% Comms Service Provider9% |
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. SAP Identity Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.