We performed a comparison between OneTrust GRC and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"Solution is scalable."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"One of the useful features is the ability to connect to various systems in order to accommodate data."
"I have found all the features to be valuable, including those involving reporting, the dashboard, notifications, email modules, the database and data input."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you have to scroll or type elsewhere and copy-paste it. It's very inconvenient."
"In terms of what can be improved, our client always says their user experience, IU/UX in RSA Archer. They found it is not as user friendly as other tools."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"There are some issues with the interface for version 6.5 but these may already be repaired and simplified in the new versions that have been released."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"Performance could be improved."
OneTrust GRC is ranked 5th in GRC with 7 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. OneTrust GRC is rated 7.6, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Costly solution that may not guarantee ROI, but remains effective in IT risk management ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". OneTrust GRC is most compared with ProcessUnity, AuditBoard, Workiva Wdesk, LogicGate and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk, AuditBoard and Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance. See our OneTrust GRC vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.