Compare Open-Xchange vs. Zimbra Collaboration
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."
"If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The web interface is powerful and easy to use.
Top Answer: If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported.
Top Answer: Zimbra must improve its solution to make it easy so that the users don't have to use webmail to connect to their accounts and log in to webmail every time. This is something that is lacking in Zimbra… more »
Views
3,162
Comparisons
2,324
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
6,289
Comparisons
5,218
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
577
Rating
8.0
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
A cost effective messaging and collaboration solution based on open source components.
Zimbra Collaboration provides administrators and their end users innovative features that solve the challenges faced by organizations using today's legacy communications infrastructure.
Learn more about Open-Xchange
Learn more about Zimbra Collaboration
1&1, Host Europe, KPN, Ziggo, namecheap, Strato, Network Solutions
NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC
Comms Service Provider48%
Computer Software Company18%
Media Company7%
Educational Organization5%
Comms Service Provider44%
Computer Software Company18%
Media Company6%
Educational Organization6%
No Data Available
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise22%
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Open-Xchange is ranked 9th in Email Applications while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 3rd in Email Applications with 3 reviews. Open-Xchange is rated 0.0, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "It is light to manage and low-cost, but lacks storage management". Open-Xchange is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, G Suite Enterprise, IceWarp, Zarafa and Microsoft Exchange Online, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, IceWarp, Kerio Connect, G Suite Enterprise and Microsoft Exchange Online.
See our list of best Email Applications vendors.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.