We performed a comparison between OpenESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."
"The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."
"The core is very stable."
"OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"The documentation needs to be better."
"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."
"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."
"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
OpenESB is ranked 13th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 4 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. OpenESB is rated 8.6, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenESB writes "Enables us to define the business process and integrate it with other software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". OpenESB is most compared with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, Mule ESB and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and Fiorano ESB.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
