Compare OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Oracle BPM

OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 19th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 12th in Business Process Management with 7 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "An enterprise-grade solution with a powerful Workspace and a complete feature set". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Pega BPM, Kofax TotalAgility and Camunda BPM, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda BPM, IBM BPM and Pega BPM. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Oracle BPM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
29,951 views|19,379 comparisons
Oracle BPM Logo
2,610 views|1,824 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Oracle BPM and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.

Read more »

In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible.It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.

Read more »

The initial setup is straightforward.Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes.The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work.This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations.We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems.The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security.

Read more »

Cons
If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.

Read more »

They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all.They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support.

Read more »

The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems.We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues.Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter.Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption.It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices.It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

Read more »

Information Not Available
The licensing model is good.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
418,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Learn
camunda
OpenText
Oracle
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Learn more about Oracle BPM
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentiTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Profit25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Construction Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company7%
Government6%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company56%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise35%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business45%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise27%
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Oracle BPM and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
418,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.