We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."
"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."
"The most valuable feature is the glossary. It is really nice because all of the information is centralized, and that is a big help to the company."
"The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time."
"We can use workflow manager to create forms."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."
"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."
"Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint."
"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."
"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."
"There are a lot of challenges with Process Manager. For example, we wanted to create a process map from an Excel sheet, but Signavio doesn't have that capability. I have raised this issue with Signavio support, but it is one of the bottlenecks we are currently facing."
"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
