Compare OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Signavio Process Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""It has an open BPM""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible.""The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros »

"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it.""The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background.""The most valuable feature for me is usability.""The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview.""I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it.""The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function.""I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art.""The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."

More Signavio Process Manager Pros »

Cons
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Lacking in forms visualization.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all.""Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons »

"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs.""It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard.""If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram.""Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good.""There could be something more on the reporting side of it for the processes you have captured or processes that might be work in progress to see where to target your effort because you don't always have lots of resources to spare""There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen.""For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses.""One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."

More Signavio Process Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people.""I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable.""I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs.""SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees.""This solution provides really great value for the money."

More Signavio Process Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Top Answer: The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It… more »
Top Answer: Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to… more »
Top Answer: Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you… more »
Top Answer: In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can… more »
Top Answer: More Machine Learning and data algorithms for predictions could be involved in order to get a better understanding of… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Signavio Process Editor
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
The Signavio Process Manager is an intuitive BPM solution for professional process modeling. Whether you want to create current-state documentation or target concepts, the Signavio Process Manager is your best choice for process modeling. Thanks to innovative web technology, you can get started right away and include your colleagues in collaborative design.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Learn more about Signavio Process Manager
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
DHL, Transurban, Prudential Life Assurance, Zalando, T-Systems, Audi BKK, 1&1, Bugatti
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government12%
Insurance Company10%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm14%
Retailer11%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Media Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise27%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 17th in Business Process Management with 2 reviews while Signavio Process Manager is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management with 36 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.6, while Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A customizable product with good stability and scalability and reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Signavio Process Manager writes "Enables us to identify business analysts that are working on two different things and link up efforts". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation, K2, webMethods Integration Server and Pega BPM, whereas Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Visio, Bizagi and ARIS Cloud. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.