Compare OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.""In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible.""The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros »

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with.""It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pros »

Cons
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all.""Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons »

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily.""ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Top Answer: The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It… more »
Top Answer: Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to… more »
Top Answer: Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you… more »
Top Answer: It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is… more »
Top Answer: ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is… more »
Top Answer: It is used for on-premises and cloud integrations. It has a number of products for on-premises integration.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Learn More
Overview

Reinventing Process Automation for the Digital Enterprise

Our process automation platform enables tens of thousands of developers to design, automate and improve processes and provide better customer experiences, deliver projects faster and increase business agility.

A complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations and analytics

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Non Profit13%
Government13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government12%
Insurance Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise28%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise59%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 17th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is ranked 26th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.0, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM writes "Helped us solve interfacing issues between platforms but the connectivity is poor". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, K2, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Case Foundation and Pega BPM, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is most compared with Pega BPM, Apache Airflow, TIBCO iProcess Suite, IBM BPM and Appian. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.