We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases.""The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now.""Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers.""There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable.""The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible.""The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros »

"The most valuable feature is stability.""All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good.""The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong.""It's very flexible and a good platform to use.""I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.""One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"The migration strategy needs to be improved.""Lacking in forms visualization.""They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome.""Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities.""Documentation can be improved.""If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet.""As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month.""I would like to see better pricing."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons »

"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG.""The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.""I would like to see the price improve.""It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly.""In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""We're using the open-source version for now.""I use the open-source free version.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We pay for the license of this solution annually.""There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version.""When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive.""The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""It's a good deal for the money that we pay.""The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support.""I would like to see better pricing for the license."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With… more »
Top Answer: Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with… more »
Top Answer: Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based… more »
Top Answer: The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It… more »
Top Answer: Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to… more »
Top Answer: Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you… more »
Top Answer: It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an… more »
Top Answer: I don't think webMethods is the cheapest but I think the quality is worth it. But it's not cheap. We're satisfied with… more »
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company22%
Non Profit11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government9%
Insurance Company8%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company18%
Computer Software Company18%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Insurance Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Retailer6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise25%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise58%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise80%
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 12 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A customizable product with good stability and scalability and reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Its single hybrid-integration platform makes it easy to troubleshoot and quickly resolve issues. Upgrades are complex". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, K2, ARIS BPA, IBM Case Foundation and BIC Platform , whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, SAP Process Orchestration, Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server report.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.