Compare OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.""In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros »

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).""We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.""A product with good API and EDI components.""All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.""The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons »

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.""We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.""The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.""The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.""The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.""It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.""The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.""It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to… more »
Top Answer: We are an information solutions company. We need a platform where we can connect all the videos through SharePoints and input and export through that. They are not going for any add-ons right now… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case is for providing user profiles.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,230
Comparisons
644
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
514
Avg. Rating
9.0
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
17,071
Comparisons
11,745
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
563
Avg. Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
Learn
OpenText
Software AG
Overview
With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Insurance Company18%
Government14%
Comms Service Provider12%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company20%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 16th in Business Process Management with 2 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 8 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Enables a host of payment options for our customers and has automated a lot of our manual processes". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Camunda BPM, Apache Airflow, Kofax TotalAgility, Pega BPM and K2, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus, SAP Process Orchestration and IBM WebSphere Message Broker. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.