OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs WorkflowGen comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
991 views|783 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WorkflowGen Logo
158 views|127 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search.""OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents.""In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible.""It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.""We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.""The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs.""The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great.""The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros →

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

More WorkflowGen Pros →

Cons
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit.""Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier.""Integration is an area where the solution lacks.""They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.""If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option.""The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use.""We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support.""OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons →

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

More WorkflowGen Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
  • "On-premises version is expensive"
  • "SharePoint uses a subscription model."
  • "There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
  • "OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
  • "The solution has a very complex pricing model."
  • "Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
  • "It has a reasonable price."
  • More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.
    Top Answer:OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers subscription-based licensing. It has a reasonable price. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use. They could enhance the integration with Power BI and make it seamless, similar to Teams.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    783
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    158
    Comparisons
    127
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
    Learn More
    Overview
    With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

    Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

    Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

    Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

    Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

    Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

    Sample Customers
    iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
    Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 53rd in Business Process Management (BPM). OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. WorkflowGen report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.