OpenText Archive Center [EOL] vs ZL Unified Archive comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Archive Center [EOL] and ZL Unified Archive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In File Archiving
15th
out of 23 in File Archiving
Views
50
Comparisons
29
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
ZL Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

Compliance doesn't have to be complex. Capture high-volume, enterprise information along with process driven data; reducing storage costs, and driving retention and disposition anywhere - on-premise, in the cloud or hybrid – Archive Center product.

Unstructured data volume growth continues to plague enterprises with high storage costs, increased legal and business risks, not to mention the operational overhead and associated human cost. As a result more businesses are looking to hosted or cloud-based archiving to offload lead applications and servers, and reduce costs around securing and managing their unstructured data.

OpenText Archive Center is a highly scalable, multi-tenant archive helping organizations manage the explosion of unstructured data (eg. email and files) while ensuring it is cost effectively and securely stored in the cloud, on premise or as a hybrid. End users access data from anywhere—online, offline or mobile—and it’s completely stub-free and transparent. Business administration features provides a broad set of archive and retention management capabilities along with system reporting, legal hold and export.

Detailed litigation support for every part of the Electronic Discovery Reference Model in proactive and reactive e-discovery.
Sample Customers
Linde Schweisstechnik GmbH, BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health
Raymond James Morgan Keegan
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer9%
Insurance Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Archive Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in File Archiving while ZL Unified Archive is ranked 15th in File Archiving. OpenText Archive Center [EOL] is rated 0.0, while ZL Unified Archive is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText Archive Center [EOL] is most compared with OpenText InfoArchive, whereas ZL Unified Archive is most compared with .

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.