Compare OpenText AXS-One Archive vs. Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver
Sponsored
 | MithilaPerera Senior Technical Support Engineer at a tech services company |
Use OpenText AXS-One Archive? Share your opinion.
Use Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AXS-One Archive vs. Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
475,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"In my experience, compared to solutions like Veritas and Veeam, while they do have their technical pluses and minuses, Commvault can save you on average forty percent initially, and then twenty to twenty-five percent annually."
"The price could perhaps be lower as well."
"Our cost is around $20,000 per month. The previous year, it was around $30,000 per month. It now costs less because Commvault changed the licensing type for providers."
"Our yearly cost is around €20,000... The cost is based on the number of users and the amount of data. They sell it per terabyte."
"There is a bit of cost involved with signing up the entire solution. It's not a cheap solution."
"Commvault licensing is a perpetual license so only the support is being renewed yearly."
"The complete license gives us options for all the features. Commvault does not license based on storage or the management components. It can integrate with any storage vendor. That means that when we are out of storage and need more, we can integrate without additional licensing. In my opinion, Commvault needs to reduce the licensing cost by 20 to 40 percent to make it cost-efficient."
"We went from Veritas NetBackup to Commvault. We switched due to upfront licensing and costs. We have more visibility into what we're actually purchasing. It seemed like, overall, the cost of Commvault was cheaper."
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
475,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: I have never used Commvault before but I have been using Veritas NetBackup for many years and I am very satisfied with… more »
Top Answer: Veritas Netbackup is more logical and it's easy to understand the technicality behind the product. It has its own logs… more »
Top Answer: Commvault has a unique administration platform with more features than its competitors.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Unify AXS-One Central Archive, Daegis Unify AXS-One Central Archive
Cloud Archiver
Commvault can help you transform your data into a powerful strategic asset, with data protection and information management solutions that enable you to protect, access and use all of your data anywhere and anytime.
OpenText AXS-One Archive is secure, highly scalable archiving software for managing the preservation, collection, review and disposal of structured and unstructured data. Systematically store or delete data according to your custom-built internal policies. Manage legal cases and perform litigation holds in the archive and easily find information.
Cloud Archiver provides a comprehensive solution that maximizes storage intelligence and data placement by using policies to control the movement of critical data from on premise storage to the most appropriate cloud storage transparently for the end users. End users access their data in the same manner they always have regardless of if the file has been archived or not making Cloud Archiver a complete solution for your data management needs.
Learn more about Commvault
Learn more about OpenText AXS-One Archive
Learn more about Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver
Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance, Alliant Credit Union, American Municipal Power, American Pacific Mortgage, AstraZeneca, Dongbu Steel, Denver Health, Dow Jones, Emirates Steel, Penn State Health, Prime Healthcare, Sonic Healthcare, Sony Network Communications, TiVO, UCONN Health, The Weitz Company
Australian Electoral Commission, OZ Minerals
Savenet Solutions
Government14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Healthcare Company8%
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government6%
Media Company4%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise49%
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise79%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AXS-One Archive vs. Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
475,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OpenText AXS-One Archive is ranked 12th in File Archiving while Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is ranked 20th in File Archiving. OpenText AXS-One Archive is rated 0.0, while Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText AXS-One Archive is most compared with OpenText Email Archiving, whereas Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is most compared with .
See our list of best File Archiving vendors.
We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.