OpenText Core Share vs Saperion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
125 views|95 comparisons
Hyland Logo
321 views|200 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Core Share and Saperion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
125
Comparisons
95
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
321
Comparisons
200
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hyland Saperion, Hyland Saperion ECM, Saperion ECM
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview

OpenText Core Share provides all the functionality needed to securely share and collaborate on projects with everyone inside and outside of the organization. Simple and intuitive to use, Core Share is a SaaS application that offers the enterprise level security and compliance IT departments require along with the flexibility that users want. Core Share’s unique ability to enable both a hybrid environment and a full cloud experience sets it apart from other major file sharing offerings.

Core Share is integrated with OpenText Core Signature, a professional and enterprise-grade electronic signature solution. An add-on to Core Share, Core Signature allows employees and third parties to sign quotes, contracts and other documents in a fast, compliant and hassle-free way. Together, users have a unified solution to solve all their enterprise content collaboration and approval needs.

Core Share is easily deployed and integrated with existing content management systems to extend collaboration beyond the corporate firewall. It integrates seamlessly with OpenText Enterprise Information Management (EIM) solutions to extend the value of existing enterprise content management (ECM) investments into the cloud.

Saperion ECM helps you improve efficiency and fulfill compliance requirements — even when managing information trapped in unstructured documents such as invoices and emails.  Saperion automates document capture, processing, management and archiving, and allows immediate content retrieval throughout the enterprise.  It supports legal, operational and regulatory requirements. Security permissions ensure that only authorized users access the information they need.  Saperion enables seamless application integrations to help you adapt to ever-changing business needs.

Sample Customers
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Government12%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Insurance Company11%
Real Estate/Law Firm11%
Government9%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise31%
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Core Share is ranked 20th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Saperion is ranked 21st in Enterprise Content Management. OpenText Core Share is rated 0.0, while Saperion is rated 3.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Saperion writes "I would like to see improvements in the web client and the workflow engine". OpenText Core Share is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint and Microsoft OneDrive, whereas Saperion is most compared with Hyland OnBase.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.