We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and Oracle WebCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"It is quite good."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"The stability is very good."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"The user interface can be improved."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"Its functions need more stability."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and Microsoft .NET Framework.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.