We performed a comparison between OpenText Extended ECM and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."
"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."
"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."
"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."
"It's a very good solution."
"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful."
"OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."
"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"The annotation tool needs improvement. In other tools, such as Hyland OnBase, you can easily do annotation. You can easily merge documents. You can easily compare documents, whereas with OpenText, it seems to be a challenge."
"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
"We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and Box, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Microsoft Purview Records Management.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
