Compare OpenText eDOCS vs. Orienge Conterra ECM

OpenText eDOCS is ranked 37th in Enterprise Content Management while Orienge Conterra ECM is ranked 36th in Enterprise Content Management. OpenText eDOCS is rated 0, while Orienge Conterra ECM is rated 0. On the other hand, OpenText eDOCS is most compared with Documentum, whereas Orienge Conterra ECM is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText eDOCS Logo
26 views|21 comparisons
Orienge Conterra ECM Logo
46 views|33 comparisons
Ranking
Views
26
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
46
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: May 2020.
418,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
OpenText
Orienge
Overview

OpenText eDOCS is a light-footprint, cost-effective and highly-flexible enterprise content management (ECM) solution for Legal, Corporate Legal, Public Sector and Professional Service organizations and corporate law departments.

The Orienge Conterra ECM system helps organizations bring order to corporate content and document management, and promote effective collaboration. 

Offer
Learn more about OpenText eDOCS
Learn more about Orienge Conterra ECM
Sample Customers
Office of General Counsel (OGC) for the City of Jacksonville, MMG, Fox Entertainment Group, Evans & Dixon, TerraLinkMunicipal facilities service provider
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: May 2020.
418,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.