OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] vs Thru comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] and Thru based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Overall, the price of the solution is good for what it does, but when you want to add some features it can get expensive."
  • More Thru Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The stability of Thru is very good.
    Top Answer:We purchased the basic solution, only to realize that there is an add-on model that would allow us to manage workflows automatically. However, it was very expensive, so we did not use it. Our… more »
    Top Answer:I've been specialising in MFT solutions since 1999, so have quite a lot of experience in this space. I know Thru's platform well, having featured on their webinars and my company Pro2col resells Thru… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    172
    Comparisons
    67
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Interactive Demo
    OpenText
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    FTS can be embedded and branded as an integrated service within a customer's own business applications and portals. Any file exchanged through FTS can be monitored through OpenText™ Active Documents for end-to-end information exchange visibility and monitoring.

    Thru’s enterprise-class managed file transfer as a service (MFTaaS) started in the cloud in 2002 and continues to provide cloud-based automated file transfer and ad hoc file sharing capabilities to some of the world’s largest corporations. Our cloud-native architecture continually delivers tangible, escalating returns on investment by uniquely addressing the most challenging secure file transfer requirements.

    Meet governance and compliance standards with the help of Thru: Every layer of our service has antivirus scanning, end-to-end encryption and a full audit trail.

    Significantly reduce IT overhead and costs from on-premises servers: Migrate to our cloud to hand off deployment, maintenance, scaling and more to Thru’s award-winning team of file transfer experts.

    Our out-of-the-box MFT connectors and APIs extend integration platform (iPaaS) capabilities, adding persistence and guaranteed delivery to file transfers.

    Execute internal or external file transfers with Thru's distributed hybrid architecture: The Thru Node (an MFT agent) is installed on-premises for internal transfers with orchestration by the cloud.

    Contact Thru to discuss your managed file transfer options.

    Sample Customers
    Anglian Water
    Dell EMC, Plus 500, Manhattan Associates, NetworkRail, Blackbaud, AB InBev, Blackwoods, Sage, Crocs
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Thru is ranked 19th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 1 review. OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Thru is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thru writes "Scalable, reliable, and excellent support". OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Thru is most compared with .

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.