OpenText MBPM vs Oracle BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
446 views|265 comparisons
Oracle Logo
2,011 views|1,631 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText MBPM and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

More OpenText MBPM Pros →

"I find the data lineage features most valuable.""The support is good.""We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package.""One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles.""The solution provides extensive functionalities.""It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require.""Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes.""The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."

More Oracle BPM Pros →

Cons
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM.""There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

More OpenText MBPM Cons →

"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter.""The product must reduce its cost.""The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems.""Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart.""Pricing is an area that could use improvement.""Oracle BPM is hard to configure.""The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace.""You have to maintain it manually."

More Oracle BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."
  • More OpenText MBPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."
  • "The licensing model is good."
  • "It's pried high, this solution is expensive."
  • "The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."
  • "This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."
  • "I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."
  • "Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."
  • "The pricing is very expensive."
  • More Oracle BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
    Top Answer:There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start with… more »
    Top Answer:We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get information… more »
    Top Answer:The solution provides extensive functionalities.
    Top Answer:The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses.
    Top Answer:The product must reduce its cost. It will help it compete with other open-source tools evolving in the market.
    Ranking
    Views
    446
    Comparisons
    265
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,011
    Comparisons
    1,631
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    502
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Camunda logo
    Compared 53% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Camunda logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
     AWS Step Functions logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Metastorm BPM
    Oracle Business Process Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
    The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.
    Sample Customers
    Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
    State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company11%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian and Pega BPM, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.