We performed a comparison between OpenText MBPM and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The best part of Pega, for me, is that they let you reuse a lot of the aspects in the product."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"This is a customizable product."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"The initial setup takes time."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda and Appian, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.