Adobe Workfront vs OpenText Media Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
782 views|321 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
83 views|17 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Workfront and OpenText Media Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Box, Aprimo and others in Digital Asset Management.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective.""The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront.""Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing.""I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.""Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful.""I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution.""The tool is very user-friendly.""The solution is stable."

More Adobe Workfront Pros →

"This is an all-in-one media solution in terms of media management."

More OpenText Media Management Pros →

Cons
"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates.""I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically.""Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved.""Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker.""The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly.""The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement.""Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof.""We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

More Adobe Workfront Cons →

"Could be more user-friendly."

More OpenText Media Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."
  • "Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."
  • "We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."
  • "Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."
  • "The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."
  • More Adobe Workfront Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.
    Top Answer:It is definitely on the expensive side compared to other alternatives like Jira.
    Top Answer:There are a few improvements needed in Adobe Workfront. Previously, while I was working with the tool, we worked on it around 2020 and 2021. We were having some difficulties creating different kinds… more »
    Top Answer:This is an all-in-one media solution in terms of media management.
    Top Answer:The solution is quite expensive and you need to pay extra for external sharing, and features such as OpenText Hightail or Accelerated Media Transfer, which allows you to batch upload content and get… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is not very user friendly, and if you're coming from a conventional enterprise content management background, there is a steep learning curve. I think it should make itself more… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    782
    Comparisons
    321
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    964
    Rating
    8.3
    7th
    Views
    83
    Comparisons
    17
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    642
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AtTask, Workfront DAM
    Learn More
    Overview

    AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

    Digital asset management (DAM) software helps organize, store and deliver rich media assets such as images, videos, animations, podcasts and more. DAM software makes it easy to search for media assets through metadata tags and provides insights about the file. The best digital asset management software allows enterprises to access digital assets anytime, anywhere and improves collaboration internally and externally with creative vendors, agencies and partners.

    Sample Customers
    Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
    Marks & Spencer, Minneapolis Institute of Art, Argos, News UK, Rosetta Stone, Tarkett, DDR Corp., PBS
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    University7%
    Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization66%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Healthcare Company3%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise69%
    Large Enterprise24%
    No Data Available

    Adobe Workfront is ranked 1st in Digital Asset Management with 31 reviews while OpenText Media Management is ranked 7th in Digital Asset Management with 1 review. Adobe Workfront is rated 8.4, while OpenText Media Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Workfront writes "A Highly Stable and Reliable Enterprise Work Management Solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Media Management writes "This provides all-in-one media management for images and videos". Adobe Workfront is most compared with Jira, Wrike, Asana, Smartsheet and JIRA Portfolio, whereas OpenText Media Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best Digital Asset Management vendors.

    We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.