We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
