We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
