Compare OpenText Process 360 vs. webMethods Integration Server

OpenText Process 360 is ranked 24th in Business Process Management with 2 reviews while webMethods Integration Server which is ranked 5th in Business Process Management with 17 reviews. OpenText Process 360 is rated 7.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Process 360 writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". OpenText Process 360 is most compared with Pega BPM, Kofax TotalAgility and K2 blackpearl, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus. See our OpenText Process 360 vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Process 360 vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.

Read more »

A product with good API and EDI components.We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed.I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well.

Read more »

Cons
They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support.

Read more »

The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that.The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client.Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,905
Comparisons
769
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
547
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
25,920
Comparisons
10,469
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
301
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Also Known As
Process 360, Global 360
Learn
OpenText
Software AG
Overview
With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about OpenText Process 360
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company30%
Maritime Company10%
Logistics Company10%
Insurance Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Financial Services Firm14%
Software R&D Company11%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business9%
Large Enterprise91%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Large Enterprise90%
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Process 360 vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email