OpenText Process 360 vs. webMethods Integration Server

OpenText Process 360 is ranked 24th in Business Process Management with 1 review vs webMethods Integration Server which is ranked 4th in Business Process Management with 17 reviews. The top reviewer of OpenText Process 360 writes "Enables us to automate a number of processes. The development tool should be made user-friendly". The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". OpenText Process 360 is most compared with Kofax TotalAgility, Comindware Tracker and Pega BPM. webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi, IBM, Software AG and others in Business Process Management.
295,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing OpenText Process 360 vs. webMethods Integration Server

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.

Read more »

We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed.I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well.Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API.It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console.I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods.

Read more »

Cons
We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support.

Read more »

We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that.The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.​Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools.Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems.This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client.Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.It is worth the cost.Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
295,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
1,418
Comparisons
863
Reviews
1
Followers
144
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
19,304
Comparisons
10,246
Reviews
17
Followers
837
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
See more OpenText Process 360 competitors »
See more webMethods Integration Server competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsProcess 360, Global 360
Website/Video
Website/VideoOpenText
Software AG
Overview
OverviewWith Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

OFFER
Learn more about OpenText Process 360
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersiTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Transportation Company
8%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Large Enterprise
89%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
8%
Large Enterprise
76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi, IBM, Software AG and others in Business Process Management.
Download now
295,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email